"chrisv" <chrisv@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:g14073tutjrulclmpvrs5agu6p0qt78n31@xxxxxxxxxx
> [H]omer wrote:
>
>>Verily I say unto thee, that Roy Schestowitz spake thusly:
>>> [Suddently it's gone]
>>
>>I found a copy:
>>
>>http://www.stltoday.com/stltoday/business/stories.nsf/0/0EE60406E44ED34C862572F8000CD63B?OpenDocument
>
> According to Micro$oft spokesman Jack Evans. "Microsoft doesn't intend
> to link to Google's desktop search from Vista because the company has
> found the product doesn't appropriately respect the privacy of a
> user's information."
>
> That is so sweet of M$ to look-out for users privacy, denying users
> the choice of using google's product in the process...
>
> Sheesh.
>
Except that he happens to be right dumbkopf. Pull your head out of your ass
and look at the big picture and not just the parts you want to see.
Watchdog group slams Google on user privacy
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/19168462/
Report: Popular Web site garners lowest possible grade
Google Inc.'s privacy practices are the WORST among the Internet's top
destinations, according to a watchdog group seeking to intensify the recent
focus on how the online search leader handles personal information about its
users.
In a report released Saturday, London-based Privacy International assigned
Google its lowest possible grade. The category is reserved for companies
with "comprehensive consumer surveillance and entrenched hostility to
privacy."
|
|
