Jerry McBride wrote:
> Oldtech wrote:
>
>> +--------------------------------------------------------------------+
>> | RIAA, Safenet Sued For Malicious Prosecution |
>> | from the what-goes-around dept. |
>> | posted by kdawson on Monday June 25, @20:34 (The Courts) |
>> | http://yro.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=07/06/25/2310205 |
>> +--------------------------------------------------------------------+
>>
>> [0]DaveAtFraud writes "Tanya Anderson, the single mother from Oregon
>> previously sued by the RIAA â?? which dropped the case just before
>> losing a
>> summary judgement â?? is now [1]suing the RIAA and their hired snoop
>> Safenet for malicious prosecution. (Safenet was formerly known as
>> MediaSentry.) Anderson is asserting claims under the Computer Fraud and
>> Abuse Act and the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organization Act. A
>> reader at Groklaw has already picked up that she is seeking to have the
>> RIAA forfeit the copyrights in question as part of the settlement
>> (search
>> the page for '18.6-7')."
>>
>
> Wow, this is awesome news. Could this be the begining of the end of the
> RIAAmadness? After all, this IS America.
>
>
>
>
Tanya does work for a Prosecutors Office, and MIGHT have some steam
behind her. The fact that she is a disabled single mother, only added
to the thrill. Imagine the scene of pushing a disabled single mom out
of her wheelchair in front of a packed court!
There is a whole lot more goodness and fact over at the Groklaw site!
Then, in seeing that Washington U. will forward extortion letters, I am
wondering if the egotistical WU Dean and Board really have a clue what
RICO means! WU could become accessory or in collusion with, a criminal
organization, when RIAA is prosecuted!
|
|
