Home Messages Index
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
Author IndexDate IndexThread Index

Re: Will he win?

  • Subject: Re: Will he win?
  • From: Mark Kent <mark.kent@xxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Thu, 8 Mar 2007 16:16:45 +0000
  • Newsgroups: comp.os.linux.advocacy
  • References: <45EF1276.2030302@bullet3.fsnet.oc.ku> <558jbrF23u13mU1@mid.individual.net> <hoa5c4-0lt.ln1@ellandroad.demon.co.uk> <55appjF246a1kU1@mid.individual.net>
  • User-agent: slrn/0.9.7.4 (Linux)
  • Xref: ellandroad.demon.co.uk comp.os.linux.advocacy:502631
B Gruff <bbgruff@xxxxxxxxxxx> espoused:
> On Thursday 08 March 2007 12:05 Mark Kent wrote:
> 
>> B Gruff <bbgruff@xxxxxxxxxxx> espoused:
>>> On Wednesday 07 March 2007 19:26 Robert Newson wrote:
>>> 
>>>>  From today's Metro
>>>>
>>>
> (http://www.metro.co.uk/weird/article.html?in_article_id=40133&in_page_id=2):
>>>> 
>>>> ``A computer user is suing Microsoft for £100,000 because his PC's
>>>> Internet Explorer program did not delete records of the pornography he
>>>> viewed...''
>>>> 
>>>> According to the EULA, all he's entitled to is $5.00 (or something like
>>>> that), not the $200,000 he's seeking.  If he wins [wc]ould it open the
>>>> floodgates for compensation for the effects of Zombies[1], etc?
>>>> 
>>>> [1] I get numerous attempts by Windwos zombies at cracking my Linux box.
>>> 
>>> Ah yes, but:-
>>> 
>>> "But he suffered 'great embarrassment' when his porn history was found by
>>> police, who arrested him in Connecticut on weapons charges, including
>>> allegations of selling illegally modified firearms and possessing
>>> bomb-making equipment"
>>> 
>>> Myself, I'd have thought that his "embarrassment" over his porn history
>>> would be the least of his worries......
>>> 
>> 
>> Oh man, you don't understand the US at all! ;-)
> 
> Heh:-)
> I guess the way it works there is that you serve 200 years for the porn, and
> *then* they fry you for the murders, right?

Almost, you get fried for the murders and /then/ you have to do the 200
years for the pr0n... :-)

> 
> Takes me back many years to a story about a guy getting a total (consecutive
> sentences) of 160 years hard labour (labor, that is).
> 
> He apologised to the judge, and told him that he thought it very unlikely
> that he'd complete the sentence.
> 
> The judge was quite touched, and being a very fair, reasonable and merciful
> chap, smiled and told him that he would be quite acceptable to the court if
> he simply did his best.....
> 


-- 
| Mark Kent   --   mark at ellandroad dot demon dot co dot uk          |
| Cola faq:  http://www.faqs.org/faqs/linux/advocacy/faq-and-primer/   |
| Cola trolls:  http://colatrolls.blogspot.com/                        |

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
Author IndexDate IndexThread Index