AB <fardblossom@xxxxxxxxx> espoused:
> On 2007-03-03, Roy Schestowitz <newsgroups@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> claimed:
>> Open Source Web Content Filtering Project
>>
>> ,----[ Quote ]
>>| Dansguardian is free for home or personal use, and limited use
>>| within Government agencies. It is NOT however free for business
>>| use. You can however use it in a business setting for a very
>>| small fee.
>> `----
>>
>> http://www.kathmannlabs.net/mediawiki/index.php?title=Open_Source_Web_Content_Filtering_Project
>> http://tinyurl.com/2ppe42
>
> I've been using DG since Junior was 3. He's 8 now. It's blocked
> everything I told it to. And I check logs often to make sure something
> new doesn't creep in.
>
> I don't know about Pissed-duh's "parental access controls". But I doubt
> they work very well, whereas DG works perfectly in my experience.
>
We have Dan's Guardian in my school, very effective indeed. I'm
surprised at the remarks on its freeness for use - I thought it was
GPLed, but perhaps I'm wrong about that - Debian is usually pretty on
target with such things. I know that the downloadable lists are
subscriber, though.
--
| Mark Kent -- mark at ellandroad dot demon dot co dot uk |
| Cola faq: http://www.faqs.org/faqs/linux/advocacy/faq-and-primer/ |
| Cola trolls: http://colatrolls.blogspot.com/ |
|
|
