John Bailo wrote:
> Roy Schestowitz wrote:
>
>> Tussle ahead, but Wii will come out on top says IDC
>>
>> ,----[ Quote ]
>
>> I have collected some links to show you that IDC is just following
>> orders of wealthy companies (notably Microsoft) and delivers biased
>> results, which are often incomplete, _by design_.
>
> Microsoft doesn't care about winning with the XBOX360. It just
> doesn't want to lose to Sony and it's Linux based PS/3.
MS does care about winning, and the PS/3 is not Linux-based.
It looks like you actually believe the crap the "advocates" post to cola.
> To me, the Wii is a "spoiler" for Sony -- a cheesy, low grade product
> with one big "hook" to take away from PS/3 sales. Microsoft, of
> course, does not want a Linux supercomputer
Hadn't you heard? The PS3 runs Linux at approx. the speed of a P3, 800mhz
system.
> in the living room and will do anything, including
> sabotaging it's own 360 product in favor of the Wii,
> to prevent that.
You're just inane - there's no other word for it. One silly statement after
another. The content of your posts is actually more ridiculous than what 7
posts (but you haven't sunk to the level of Rex Ballard yet).
|
|
