nessuno@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
Being somewhat unfamiliar with the technical aspects of the issue,
what I ask myself is this: Is this episode an example of poorly
implemented DRM that would obviously be broken in short order, or is
it in principle *impossible* to construct a DRM method that cannot be
broken?
But to break it they've had to reverse engineer it and so break the DMCA?
Reminds me of that e-book encryption that was so stupidly easy (summat like
rot-13) but basically relied on the DMCA to make it "tough".
|
