__/ [ 7 ] on Saturday 19 May 2007 08:04 \__
> Roy Schestowitz wrote:
>
>> InnoTek VirtualBox [Mini Review]
>>
>> ,----[ Quote ]
>> | Overall I am impressed with the performance and features of InnoTek
>> | Virtual Box. The performance wasn't as impressive as it was with
>> | Parallel's desktop but it was better than the performance I got with
>> | VMware Fusion.
>> `----
>>
>> http://digitaldiscobash.com/2007/05/16/innotek-virtualbox/
>>
>>
>> Related:
>>
>> VirtualBox installation screenshots
>>
>> ,----[ Quote ]
>> | VirtualBox is an opensource virtualization software, it has a nice
>> | graphical interface like VMWare, and which is a lack of QEMU,
>
>
> Well I am posting this from a Qemu session launched by a graphical
> interface called Qemu Launcher (v 1.7.2) running on Ubuntu
I think that RHEL 5 comes with Qemu (among three virtualisation options).
Looking at alternatives like Windows Server 2008 (if it's even released in
2008), this is pretty good. Server 2008 will not even have virtualisation as
I understand it and it'll be available as an OEM item. Microsoft may be
still stuck 5 years behind modern technology. But it markets and terrorises
customers... buy Windows or be shot (in court).
--
~~ Best regards
Roy S. Schestowitz | Free 3-D Othello: http://othellomaster.com
http://Schestowitz.com | Free as in Free Beer ¦ PGP-Key: 0x74572E8E
Cpu(s): 24.1% user, 4.2% system, 0.6% nice, 71.0% idle
http://iuron.com - semantic engine to gather information
|
|
