InnoTek VirtualBox [Mini Review]
,----[ Quote ]
| Overall I am impressed with the performance and features of InnoTek
| Virtual Box. The performance wasn't as impressive as it was with
| Parallel's desktop but it was better than the performance I got with
| VMware Fusion.
`----
http://digitaldiscobash.com/2007/05/16/innotek-virtualbox/
Related:
VirtualBox installation screenshots
,----[ Quote ]
| VirtualBox is an opensource virtualization software, it has a nice
| graphical interface like VMWare, and which is a lack of QEMU, recently
| (march, 14th) it has released its version this is what their site says
| about VirtualBox.
`----
http://linux.go2linux.org/node/54
VirtualBox 1.3.8 Released
,----[ Quote ]
| Mar 14, 2007. InnoTek today announced that it has released a maintenance
| update to VirtualBox, bringing it to version 1.3.8. A large number of
| corrections and improvements have been made, addressing requests from both
| commercial customers and community members. The list of supported Linux
| systems has further increased with the addition of custom installation
| packages for Red Hat Enterprise Linux 4 (RHEL4) and Mandriva 2007.1.
`----
http://www.virtualbox.org/wiki/News
The Year of Virtualization
,----[ Quote ]
| I think that Windows will continue to succumb to Linux in the data
| center, MySQL and Postgres will continue to win projects that once
| fell to Oracle and DB/2.
`----
http://virtualization.sys-con.com/read/162110_p.htm
Virtualization: Linux's killer app
,----[ Quote ]
| Think about it. Even Microsoft supports running Linux on its Virtual
| Server product. Why would it do that? Wouldn't an OS partitioning
| technology, such as that used by OpenVz or Sun Solaris, be more in
| keeping with the kind of homogeneous environments that Microsoft
| would like to see? Why would Microsoft invest its resources to
| support a virtual machine technology that can only open the
| door to Linux in the datacenter?
`----
http://www.infoworld.com/article/07/02/19/08OPopenent_1.html
|
|
