Home Messages Index
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
Author IndexDate IndexThread Index

Re: Schestowitz debunked

  • Subject: Re: Schestowitz debunked
  • From: John Locke <johnlocke98513@xxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Sat, 12 May 2007 07:12:43 -0700
  • Newsgroups: comp.os.linux.advocacy
  • References: <4644723e$0$2286$ec3e2dad@news.usenetmonster.com> <MPG.20aedd4ddaa80ab198971a@news.lafn.org> <4645c49b$0$2282$ec3e2dad@news.usenetmonster.com>
  • Xref: ellandroad.demon.co.uk comp.os.linux.advocacy:524382
On Sat, 12 May 2007 09:45:32 -0400, "amicus_curious" <ACDC@xxxxxxx>
wrote:

>I read them and chuckle about how shallow, superficial, and repetitive they 
>are.  When you add this silly parade to his grossly uninformed opinions on 
>finance and business in general, it is a great comfort to the Microsoft fans 
>to know how inept and ineffective the OSS opposition appears to be.  The 
>only caution is to not become too complacent.
>
>The flood of trivia posted here mostly affects the OSS proponents anyway, 
>preventing them from putting forth any meaningful thoughts of their own. 
>
That's odd. I found this post to be "shallow, superficial, and
repetitive".


[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
Author IndexDate IndexThread Index