On Fri, 11 May 2007 17:35:37 -0700, John Locke wrote:
> On Fri, 11 May 2007 10:33:48 -0500, dorno <dorno@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>>On Fri, 11 May 2007 09:41:52 -0400, amicus_curious wrote:
>>
>>> Read all about it:
>>>
>>> http://blogs.zdnet.com/Bott/?p=247&tag=nl.e622
>>
>>He doesn't need to be debunked. He needs to be deported. Or sentenced
>>to a life of deleting spam one by one and by starting at newgroup 0 and
>>ending at zzz. Sentence to end when there is no spam remaining.
>>
>>If it weren't for kill lists, his kind would make groups like this
>>unusable.
>>
>>dorno
Here we have yet another wintroll whining, because it's posting in the
wrong group, & its posts are getting lost.
> I'm confused. Exactly how are tehcnical news postings related to spam ?
They aren't.
> Actually, I find Roy's postings quite convenient and informative.
As I do, for I don't have time to search through every tech website.
> Your negative posting doesn't hold water.
It's another strawman argument from a wintroll.
|
|
