Jonathan Byrd wrote:
> "[H]omer" <spam@xxxxxxx> wrote in message news:m9l0j4-gca.ln1@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > Verily I say unto thee, that Roy Schestowitz spake thusly:
> >> Proprietary vs Open Source: The Fight Continues
> >>
> >> ,----[ Quote ]
> >> | Asheesh Raina, principal research analyst for Gartner's Software Group
> >> | said, "We believe that Microsoft is strengthening its patent portfolio
> >> | to rectify the exploitation of its Intellectual Property (IP) by
> >> | technology providers that generate substantial revenue from OSS
> >> | including Linux."
> >> `----
> >>
> >> http://www.sda-asia.com/sda/features/psecom,id,1209,nodeid,1,_language,Singapore.html
> >
> > Oh "we believe" do we, Asheesh Raina?
> >
> > And how much of Microsoft's source code have "we" compared to the
> > alleged infringing FOSS source code, in order to establish this
> > "belief", I wonder?
> >
> > Or does "research" mean "read the script Microsoft handed us" now?
> >
> > You've gotta laugh at FUDies claiming Microsoft is being *exploited*.
> >
> > ROTF!
> >
> > --
> > K.
> > http://slated.org
> >
> > ,----
> > | <This sig left intentionally blank>
> > `----
> >
> > Fedora Core release 5 (Bordeaux) on sky, running kernel 2.6.20-1.2312.fc5
> > 17:26:47 up 43 days, 14:58, 2 users, load average: 0.16, 0.37, 0.71
>
>
> paid shill Omer must reply to every post shestowitz makes.
>
> must reply.
So Linux uses paid shills now?
I dunno, is there anything those nasty OSS-types won't copy from MS?
|
|
