In article <1180309000.242056.55040@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>,
digger.junkie@xxxxxxxxx says...
> The reason I ask is because I see many of the same posts that appear
> in COLA, over at digg,.com.
>
> The main difference is that the posts get a completely different
> reaction over at digg.
>
> Posts with misleading subject lines, shill posts and so forth are
> moderated down and the poster is confronted with the facts and asked
> to explain himself/herself.
>
> I see no system of checks and balances here in COLA.
> All I see is 5 people who confirm each others convoluted and
> hysterical rantings and who seem to completely ignore the facts.
> Don't believe it?
> Go to digg.com and read the same exact posts you read here and observe
> the reaction of the digg community toward obvious spamming, misleading
> subject lines and plain out and out lying.
> Maybe in COLA if you tell the same lie over and over long enough it
> becomes truth.
> Not so in other places.
>
> They don't seem to tolerate the B.S that passes for truth here in
> comp.os.linux.advocacy.
> And they sure as hell don't accept blatant spamming.
>
Digg.com, a cleaninghouse for laborers armed with dull shovels?
|
|
