____/ Mark Kent on Friday 09 November 2007 18:19 : \____
> ed <ed@xxxxxxxxxxx> espoused:
>> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
>> Hash: SHA1
>>
>> On Fri, 09 Nov 2007 00:17:56 +0000
>> Roy Schestowitz <newsgroups@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>
>>> ____/ ed on Thursday 08 November 2007 23:59 : \____
>>>
>>> > On Thu, 08 Nov 2007 12:40:30 -0800
>>> > ball.cock.the.plumber@xxxxxxxxx wrote:
>>> >
>>> >> He sure does seem to have an obsession with castration?
>>> >>
>>> >>
>>>
http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&q=schestowitz%2Bcastrate&btnG=Google+Search
>>> >>
http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&q=schestowitz%2Bcastration&btnG=Search
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > That's not post originating from Roy though, that's stuff from
>>> > others containing those search terms.
>>>
>>> All are fake posts from Gary Stewart, a.k.a. "flatfish", a.k.a.
>>> ball.cock.the.plumber@xxxxxxxxx, who pretended to be me and cited his
>>> own forged posts.
>>
>> Maybe we should all start gpg inline signing ... it makes the message
>> messy, but it would help avoid some fraud.
>
> It was successful before, last time Gary Stewart had a crush on several
> of us.
>
> Roy - as you're most under fire at the moment, why don't you start GPG
> signing?
I'll try it for a while. Hopefully this won't annoy anyone. :-S
--
~~ Best of wishes
Roy S. Schestowitz | Windows XP: Dude, where's my RAM?
http://Schestowitz.com | GNU/Linux | PGP-Key: 0x74572E8E
Mem: 515500k total, 447712k used, 67788k free, 1016k buffers
http://iuron.com - next generation of search paradigms
|
|
