After takin' a swig o' grog, Hadron belched out this bit o' wisdom:
> a) He's a spammer
Here? Not in my view. It is too much material, but much of it is
on-topic in some way.
> b) invariably wrong
Sometimes wrong, or hurried.
> c) a nasty piece of work when cornered who threatens physical violence.
You have any message-ID to prove that?
Although he's been buckling a bit under the pressure lately, he is far
more polite than most people engaged in the turmoil that is COLA.
> d) a link plagiarist who denies the source sites from hit count by
> copying their work
What a stupid concept: make public links, then cry when people use them
or duplicate the material.
Part of the robustness of the internet is its redundancy.
> oh. and
>
> e) A liar who manipulates headlines to suit himself and generate as many
> links to his sites which generate revenue.
I usually prefer to go to the other sites in his references.
Roy's posts are, on the balance, a good thing. More selectivity and
reduced volume would be nice.
However, here's the kicker -- Roy is perfectly free to do what goddam
wants to here, just like the more noxious posters such as linux-sux and
clogwog.
--
It's like herding cats!
|
|
