Home Messages Index
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
Author IndexDate IndexThread Index

Re: A trivial example of usabilty in KDE versus Windows

____/ Peter Köhlmann on Tuesday 06 November 2007 22:34 : \____

> owl wrote:
> 
>> Snit <CSMA@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>> "amicus_curious" <ACDC@xxxxxxx> stated in post
>>> 47307f08$0$23772$ec3e2dad@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx on 11/6/07 7:49 AM:
>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> Where I think you are missing the boat is the degree of expertise that
>>>> is
>>>> required.  The Windows painful, step-by-step approach works for someone
>>>> who is not familiar with the terse "extract here" item hidden in the
>>>> properties
>>>> access menu.  Presumably, if/when one gains some facility with the
>>>> operation, the user would install the WinRAR program which adds the
>>>> quick selection menus to the list.
>>> 
>>> On OS X a user just double clicks.  Boom.
>>> 
>> 
>> That doesn't sound like a happy result.
> 
> It isn't. It would be about the dumbest thing to do
> 
> Simply unzipping the file is the worst possible move in lots of cases
> 
> But then, this is the OSX way. Treat the users as if they are total retards.
> Because quite probably, they are

I disagree. I quite like it how in OS 9 archives were automatically
uncompressed, without user intervention at all. You could still operate on the
compressed file if you wanted to, but it was assumed that a desired step is to
unstrip the compression layer (with StuffIt).

-- 
                ~~ Best of wishes

Roy S. Schestowitz      |   Apache: commercial software's days are numbered
http://Schestowitz.com  | Free as in Free Beer |  PGP-Key: 0x74572E8E
Load average (/proc/loadavg): 1.11 0.86 0.93 3/129 22694
      http://iuron.com - semantic search engine project initiative

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
Author IndexDate IndexThread Index