On Sun, 04 Nov 2007 10:18:19 -0500, Jeremy Wembley wrote:
>
> "Kier" <vallon@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
> news:pan.2007.11.04.14.57.23.743525@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> On Sun, 04 Nov 2007 09:39:29 -0500, Jeremy Wembley wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> "Kier" <vallon@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
>>> news:pan.2007.11.04.14.21.13.166816@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>>> On Sun, 04 Nov 2007 08:41:31 -0500, Jeremy Wembley wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> "Sinister Midget" <sinister.midget@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
>>>>> news:1194120733.226505.108220@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I hope that his masters pay him well to sell his credibility like
>>>>>> this
>>>>>> and post what he knows are lies. But the child does seem to be self
>>>>>> destructing. He's frantically posting faster and faster and making up
>>>>>> more lies and intentionally misleading subject lines than ever
>>>>>> before.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I suspect that his masters who pay him a few pence for posting this
>>>>>> tripe are not happy with him. It seems that Microsoft is doing quite
>>>>>> well. His bosses who pay him to shill for linux want more production
>>>>>> from him or he will lose his pathetic job.
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Anyone who spends hours and hours spamming all of these newsgroups and
>>>>> websites is either being paid or is a mental case. No "normal person"
>>>>> wastes this much time (including all of Christmas day) posting all of
>>>>> these
>>>>> lies.
>>>>
>>>
>>>> What 'normal' person spends their life nymshifting in order to slander
>>>> Linux advocates,
>>>
>>> I have nothing against "Linux advocates" - I do however take exception
>>> to
>>> LIARS who intentionally make up false and deceiving headlines in order
>>> to
>>> "advocate" linux.
>>
>> Whereas you don't giev a jot about the liars who make up filthy slanders
>> about Roy's completely bogus sexual problems, etc, do you?
>
> What Schestowitz brings upon himself for lying and making up false and
> misleading headlines is simply he deserves. He is reaping what he has sown.
Rubbish. Whatever Roy's faults as an advocate, they *DO NOT* justify
filthy, untrue and scurrilous attacks upon him.
>
> Your position seems to be that 'It's okay for Roy Schestowitz to make up
> lies because other people do it to him." It is more likely that other
I said no such thing.
> people attack Roy because of his dishonesty and lies. I'm quite certain
> that if he would stop his lies the personal attacks would end.
Pointing out lies or misrepresentations is one thing, making libellous
atacks is quite another.
>
>
>>>
>>>
>>>> the way you do, scum?
>>>
>>> Unlike Roy Schestowitz, at least I do not receive money for my posts.
>>
>> Where's the proof that he does?
> Then why doesn't he categorically deny that he does not receive
He has.
> compensation to "advocate linux" and that he has never been compensated to
> advocate linux. Here's an example, watch.
>
> I swear on the bible and the life of my family that I have never been paid
> or otherwise to post to this newsgroup, any newsgroup or any website. I
> realize that this is just a "nym" but neither this "nym" or my truthful
> name has ever received so much as a single cent of compensation for any
> post to any internet site. I swear this before God and country on this
> morning of November 04, 2007.
And exactly *why* should he have to do this? Because *you*, a nymshifting
liar, say so? I think not.
>
> See. I have never been paid and am not being paid to post. You may elect to
> believe me or not but it doesn't change the truth that I am not paid nor
> have I ever been paid to post anything. Why is Roy Schestowitz afraid to
> say this? (Hint - It's because his advocacy is paid and bought. He is a
> fraud and his intentions are driven purely by financial greed and profit.)
Where's your proof? You have none.
>
>
>> Nobody gets paid to post here.
> Except for Roy Schestowitz - He is a paid shill and liar.
Where's you proof? YOu have none. That makes *you* the LIAR, liar.
--
Kier
|
|
