In article <2164691.FHR9DgS3MJ@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>,
Roy Schestowitz <newsgroups@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> ____/ Tim Smith on Friday 02 November 2007 09:41 : \____
> > In article <8747581.ttgQFb7vAf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>,
> > Roy Schestowitz <newsgroups@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >> >
> >> > http://www.xbitlabs.com/news/memory/display/20071031214902.html
> >>
> >> That's the sort of patent mess that a not reform is intended to resolve,
> >> but
> >> a more civil industry can solve.
> >
> > Could you say that again, but in English this time?
>
>
> s/a not/not a/
So you meant to say:
That's the sort of patent mess that not a reform is intended to
resolve, but a more civil industry can solve.
?
It's still not close to a coherent English sentence.
|
|
