Roy Schestowitz wrote:
> Is Microsoft Claiming Ownership Of Embedded Linux?
>
> ,----[ Quote ]
> | The question, of course, is why Kyocera Mita would need a patent from
> | Microsoft to enhance products built on embedded Linux. Is it adding
> | proprietary Microsoft technology on top of embedded Linux?
> |
> | Could be…
> |
> | Or is this a case of Kyocera Mita accepting a claim by Microsoft that
> | embedded Linux is among the 235 open source technologies Microsoft
> | insists it owns.
> |
> | Microsoft says the deal "delivers on our promise to continue to build a
> | bridge between open source and proprietary software and technologies."
> `----
>
>
http://www.informationweek.com/blog/main/archives/2007/11/is_microsoft_cl.html
Remind me not to buy any Kyocera Mita products. I wouldn't want to infringe
any 'patents' would I.
Tim.
|
|
