On Nov 15, 2:48 am, Mark Kent <mark.k...@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> [H]omer <s...@xxxxxxx> espoused:
>
>
>
>
>
> > Verily I say unto thee, that Matt spake thusly:
> >> Peter Köhlmann wrote:
> >>> Matt wrote:
> >>>> [H]omer wrote:
> >>>>> Verily I say unto thee, that Matt spake thusly:
>
> >>>>>> Okay, but why not simply cut and paste the article's original
> >>>>>> title: "MIT releases the sources of MULTICS, the father of
> >>>>>> UNIX!" ?
> >>>>> Why does it matter?
>
> >>>> Well now haven't you asked a foolish question?
>
> >>> I can't see anything "foolish" there. *Why* does it matter?
>
> >> The subject line of a Usenet post matters not in the least to anyone
> >> who:
>
> >> 1) reads every article, or 2) reads no article, or 3) reads articles
> >> at random.
>
> >> I think you are a smart man. Maybe you could fill in the rest of the
> >> answer.
>
> > How about you just tell us, since you are obviously so sure of the
> > answer? After all, you are the one who raised the objection. Why not
> > just explain that objection in detail, assuming you can?
>
> > So why *do* you have a problem with a subject line citing a product
> > description in lieu of its name?
>
> > Be sure to let us know when you've formulated a lucid answer.
>
> > Or do you intend just repeating the this inane "you should know"
> > response forever?
>
> Ahh, the root of so many romantic fiction novels... "if you loved me,
> you'd know..."
>
> Unfortunately, we don't do romantic fiction in cola.
>
>
I don't know, you and Doug put on quite a show the other day...
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.os.linux.advocacy/msg/966b073f2ddfe238?dmode=source
|
|
