On Fri, 30 Nov 2007 15:15:03 -0500, flatfish wrote:
> On Fri, 30 Nov 2007 19:55:24 +0000, Kier <vallon@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>>On Fri, 30 Nov 2007 14:43:23 -0500, flatfish wrote:
>>
>>> On Fri, 30 Nov 2007 19:15:03 +0000, Kier <vallon@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>
>>>>On Fri, 30 Nov 2007 13:20:28 -0500, flatfish wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> On Fri, 30 Nov 2007 17:44:14 +0000, Roy Schestowitz
>>>>> <newsgroups@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>>They killed the UNIX/Linux section in Digg about 4 weeks ago. Ask everyone who
>>>>>>is in Digg and they'll tell you. Regulars saw the shills and went elsewhere.
>>>>>>All my comments there start at -3 or -2 because at least 3 accounts are being
>>>>>>used to systematically mod down all my comments and bury my submissions.
>>>>>>Personal attacks and outright slander are included.
>>>>>
>>>>> You're nuts Roy.
>>>>> Why not show COLA the messages you posted about Digg being censored,
>>>>> Digg people being out to silence you and so forth.
>>>>>
>>>>> Here is one:
>>>>>
>>>>> ***************************************************************
>>>>>
>>>>> http://digg.com/linux_unix/Is_Microsoft_Still_Trying_to_Shut_Me_Up_Using_Lies
>>>>>
>>>>> By cstrippie on 11/17/2007
>>>>> 1. Blogspam
>>>>> 2. Not in any way related to Linux/Unix.
>>>>> 3. "Poor me" rant is even lamer than what you post as Cyberphoenix.
>>>>>
>>>>> *************************************************************
>>>>
>>>>I searche dfor that nym, on digg. Nothing came up. I wonder why that is,
>>>>flatty...
>>>
>>> Because you are unable to perform a proper search?
>>> Try this:
>>>
>>> http://diggcomments.headzoo.com/Default.aspx?user=cstrippie
>>>
>>> Don't hurt yourself now.....
>>
>>Don't try and get smart, flatty. I was talking about CyberPhoenix.
>
> Oh that one.
> Well Roy got smart and ditched the account when people caught on to
> what he was up to. You can still find the posts, like the one below
> and judge for yourself.
>
> However, here is a post where CyberPhoenix and Roy talk to themselves.
> I even got in on this one:
>
> http://digg.com/linux_unix/People_of_openSUSE_Federico_Mena_Quintero#c10667041
And exact;y where is the proof this person is Roy?
>
>>>
>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Tell me, how does one get a -125 or so on a submission?
>>>>> Are you claiming it's not because people are sick of your SPAM?
>>>>
>>>>What spam is that, flatty?
>>>
>>> Misleading messages, references back to his own blogs and websites as
>>> proof of his statements.
>>
>>Not spam.
>
> More like garbage.
>
>
>>> The same crap he does here in COLA only the people in digg figured it
>>> out a long time ago which is why Roy claims there is a conspiracy
>>> against him.
>>
>>Not spam.
>
> One way garbage.
Then call it that and cease with the spam. It's not spam.
> Tell me, how much discussion does Roy's posts promote?
> Most are one way messages with no replies.
> That's SPAM.
NO, it's NEWS. That's what he tagged it NEWS for, dimbulb.
>
>>>
>>> COLA is just a little slow
>>
>>Make your accusations PLAIN, flatty, or shut up.
>
> I already have.
> You have to take your head out of Roy's ass in order to understand
> though.
No, you have not. YOu've made veiled insinuations, without substance.
>
>>>
>>>
>>>>That's really rich, coming for a lying little troll who dare not post his
>>>>mud-slinging lies under his own name.
>>>
>>> In COLA?
>>> Are you nuts!
>>
>>No.
>
> You must be to use a real name.
>>>
>>> With mentally unstable people like Doug Mentohl, Roy Schestowitz, Mark
>>> Kent, William Poaster, Ml2Mst or whatever his name is today only a
>>
>>YOu say they are mentally unstable. That makes *you* a complete raving
>>looney-tunes.
>
> Haha!
> But not looney enough to use a real name.
Not honest enough, either.
>
>
>>Wrong, flatty. Since a large majority of those who post here do so under
>>their own names, and since their 'agenda' is no more than Linux advocacy,
>>your theory falls on its face at the first hurdle.
>
> How do you know they are real names?
How do you know they aren't?
> Just because William Poaster sounds like a real name doesn't mean it
> is actually their own name.
> By your criteria if I posted as Johnny Garcia my messages would be
> more credible.
>
> Idiotic thinking and COLA at it's best.
>
> BTW every single Internet security, safety, advice site will tell you
> the worst possible thing you can do is use your real name online
> unless absolutely necessary.
>
> So they are all wrong and you COLA freaks are right?
> I don't think so.
You don't actually think at all, flatty.
>
>
>>Some day you will MAKE YOUR ACCUSATIONS PLAIN, or SHUT UP. You keep
>>insinuating, yet you have nothing real or substantial to give. Put up or
>>shut up.
>
> Save your breath, you're starting to hyperventilate.
Nope. Put up or shut up.
>
>
>>I have no idea, unless it is that you and your kind suggest it. Why should
>>he bow you anyone like you?
>
> You'll have to ask Mark Kent about Roy bowing.......
> I wouldn't know.
>
>
>>Idiot. Put up, or shut up.
>
> I already have.
No, flatty, you haven't. You've made vague, unsubstantiated insinuations,
without anything to back them up.
>
>
>>Whereas you are just a slimeball without morals or any kind.
>>
>>I repeat, put up or shut up.
>
> You repeat a lot.
> You just don't seem to say anything.
I say what I mean, no more, no less. Put up or shut up, flatty. Preferably
shut up, if you have nothing better to say.
--
Kier
|
|
