On Thu, 29 Nov 2007 21:59:45 -0500, flatfish wrote:
> On Thu, 29 Nov 2007 21:51:21 -0500, Linonut <linonut@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> wrote:
>
>
>>Why would he respond to your stupid "calling out"?
>
> He won't.
> He's too busy loading up the spam machine for the nightly flood.
>
>>> Roy is the single BEST advocate for NOT using Linux software.
>>
>>Nah, he's actually pretty decent.
> Not even close.
> Roy is considered a joke in most Linux groups.
> Check digg for example.
>
> How the hell can a person who submits 1000's of articles have a
> negative rating?
>
>>> Roy is to Linux advocacy what Pat Robertson is to religion.
>>
>>Nah, he just gets a bit obsessive. Been there.
>
> He's a cracked pot.
>
>>> The more Roy Spams, the worse this group becomes and the more clouded
>>> and convoluted the search engines become.
>>
>>What a farking load of crap. You know what pollutes this group the
>>most? The posts of Clogwog, the Dizum Dipshit, that Linux-Sux nutcase
>>who posts from Teranews, and you, the flatfish.
>>
>>It's a crap flood, and you are part of it.
>
> Search on flatfish+ anything and keep in mind that flatfish is a real
> fish (flounder).
X-NO-Archive, flatty. ANd nyms. That's how you keep yuour low (in all
senses) profile. Roy, on the other hand, uses his own genuine name.
>
> Now do the same for schestowitz+anything.
>
> See what you get?
>
> The guy has infiltrated, polluted just about every corner of the net.
Crapola.
>
> Don't you find it interesting that he used to be a top poster to
> usenet alt.internet.search-engines before he started spamming COLA?
Point one: no, I don't, and nor will anyone else. Point two, he is not
spamming.
>
> Read some of his older posts in that group and decide for yourself
> what he is up to.
If you have any genuine accusation to make, make it, or shut up with the
insinuations.
--
Kier
|
|
