* Roy Schestowitz fired off this tart reply:
> They used to mention Vista every other month. No word for a long time. It
> figures. The same goes for the BadVista blog.
http://badvista.fsf.org/logos/BadVista_no_littering.png
Vista: So bad that Badvista.fsf.org is not needed.
Actually, even though SP1 doesn't promise any real performance boost,
I'm sure it will fix a few problems, and uptake will creep back up.
Not that I have to worry. We won't be adopting Vista at work anytime
soon. And we don't have to worry about this, we're not paying for this
stuff:
http://www.nmcistinks.com/
We will be waiting with baited breath as the promised "tech refresh"
rolls out. If it ever does. Many of the early deployment sites are
well into four years on their hardware. This is hardware that was two
years out of date when they originally received it. Of course Windows
2000 is going into it's seventh year of life, long ago eclipsed by
Windows XP and soon to be further antiqued by Windows Vista.
Inquiring minds would love to see the check that EDS writes to
Microsoft every year for almost exclusive support of the outdated
Windows 2000.
--
Tux rox!
|
|
