* flatfish fired off this tart reply:
>>Reaper? That thing is still around?
>
> Sure is Roy Schestowitz.
> And believe it or not, they (the users) are trying to make it work
> under Linux.
He was talking about a poster here who used the nym "T.G. Reaper", dude.
> http://www.cockos.com/reaper/
Looks cool.
> Reaper and Linux:
>
> http://www.cockos.com/forum/search.php?searchid=299271
>
> Most people would PAY for a Linux version of Reaper, Sonar, Cubase,
> Nuendo etc because the Linux DAW software is a complete joke.
> Alas it's not currently in the cards because Linux's market share is
> dismal and it's not worth the time to develop for Linux.
http://www.linuxjournal.com/article/9892
After plugging this interface in to my laptop and configuring it
properly, I have a multitrack hard disk recorder that can
simultaneously record 24 tracks at a maximum sample rate of 96KHz,
well above the maximum available sample rate on far more expensive
commercial HDRs, with more available input tracks.
That's a "solution".
http://www.ardour.org/
Above all, Ardour strives to meet the needs of professional users.
This means implementing all the "hard stuff" that other DAWs ( even
some leading commercial apps ) handle incorrectly or not at all.
That's the "software".
http://www.rme-audio.com/english/hdsp/multifa.htm
That's the "hardware".
http://digitalmedia.oreilly.com/2005/11/09/inside-the-korg-oasys.html
Inside a Luxury Synth: Creating the Linux-Powered Korg OASYS
In other words, even though there's obviously more out there Windows at
this time, Linux is /definitely/ worth the time to develop for.
--
Tux rox!
|
|