Home Messages Index
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
Author IndexDate IndexThread Index

Re: Billionaires and Their Lobbyists Try to Eliminate Linux Torrents, P2P

  • Subject: Re: Billionaires and Their Lobbyists Try to Eliminate Linux Torrents, P2P
  • From: Darth Chaos <DarthChaosofRSPW@xxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Fri, 23 Nov 2007 16:59:40 -0800 (PST)
  • Bytes: 2433
  • Complaints-to: groups-abuse@xxxxxxxxxx
  • Injection-info: d21g2000prf.googlegroups.com; posting-host=75.109.9.127; posting-account=FOIaUwkAAAAsnNA1zERiBI9Of_fqDzwF
  • Newsgroups: comp.os.linux.advocacy
  • Organization: http://groups.google.com
  • References: <1840142.8m9OU8F0TO@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • User-agent: G2/1.0
  • Xref: ellandroad.demon.co.uk comp.os.linux.advocacy:579206
On Nov 23, 5:50 pm, Roy Schestowitz <newsgro...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
> Mark Cuban to ISPs: block all P2P traffic; Ars to Cuban: um, no
>
> ,----[ Quote ]
> | Of course, there are many legitimate uses for P2P that Google Video can't
> | replace, like distributing Linux ISOs. Furthermore, the notion that the only
> |          ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
> | people who benefit from P2P technology are the distributors is wrong. If I
> | have the option of grabbing a download from a distant single server or from a
> | torrent with hundreds of users, I'm going to opt for the torrent. Why? It's
> | almost guaranteed to be faster, and let's face it: most BitTorrent software
> | is quite adept at managing large downloads. Perhaps I want to throttle it
> | while playing a game; perhaps I want to encrypt my transfers. If I'm
> | distributing video or audio, perhaps I don't wish to be bound by the terms of
> | Google Video.
> `----
>
> http://arstechnica.com/news.ars/post/20071122-mark-cuban-to-isps-bloc...

Isn't Mark Cuban the one who said he was gonna fund that 9/11 Twoof
film "Loose Change" in the theaters?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
Author IndexDate IndexThread Index