The "true linux advocate", "kernel hacker", "emacs user", "swapfile
expert", "X specialist", "CUPS guru", "USB-disk server admin", "newsreader
magician" and "hardware maven" Hadron Quark, aka Hans Schneider, aka Damian
O'Leary wrote:
> Peter Köhlmann <peter.koehlmann@xxxxxxxxxxx> writes:
>
>> Tim Smith wrote:
>>
>>> In article <6559481.m9NjJRaMCd@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>,
>>> Roy Schestowitz <newsgroups@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>> I'm not sure if it's Scott or Gary, but the the following blocked
>>>> requests showed up earlier. One of them attempts comment abuse again.
>>>> Twice.
>>>>
>>>> [Sun Oct 7 17:54:19 2007] [error] [client 24.60.155.178] client denied
>>>> [by
>>>> server configuration: /home/boycottn/public_html/index.php
>>>
>>> According to Linonut, you have no right to do that. You have to provide
>>> service to everyone.
>>>
>>
>> Nice show of true colours, Tim
>> Do you still claim not to be a worthless troll?
>
> How is directing Roybot to Linonut trolling?
Roy is connected to Linonut exactly how?
> Linonut told us that all
> servers should give free access to everyone.
Given your reading comprehension problems and your (and Tim Hadrons) inbred
dishonesty, you would have to provide exact Msg-IDs
Your both claims are completely worthless
And even *if* Linonut had claimed such, why should anybody else care? I am
not bound to anyone elses claims, and so isn't Roy
> Or do you think he is full of shit and talking rubbish?
Tim Hadron? Certainly
Explain how it affects Roy what others are (or aren't) claiming?
Be precise
> Do tell Peter. And try not to confuse yourself too much in the process.
>
--
This problem was sponsored by Microsoft
|
|
