Open Source Software: Do You Have Time to Exploit It?
,----[ Quote ]
| The prevailing wisdom regarding open source communities is that they foster
| innovation in software. Members of the open source community not only share
| development code, they compete in a meritocracy for bragging rights on key
| features, patches, and contributions that they deliver at breakneck speed.
`----
http://www.bmighty.com/hardware_software/showArticle.jhtml?articleID=202103742
Pluggable Security
,----[ Quote ]
| While James had no complaints about Smack itself, he expressed concerns
| regarding the pluggable nature of LSM, which is used by Smack,
| cautioning, "if LSM remains, security will never be a first class citizen of
| the kernel," adding, "on a broader scale, we'll miss the potential of Linux
| having a coherent, semantically strong security architecture." He noted that
| he'd rather see SELinux as the sole Linux security framework, "merging Smack,
| however, would lock the kernel into the LSM API. Presently, as SELinux is the
| only in-tree user, LSM can still be removed."
`----
http://kerneltrap.org/Linux/Pluggable_Security
Related:
Innovation: The REAL Killer App
,----[ Quote ]
| There is no true innovation in Windows Vista. Microsoft has spent
| years developing a product that nobody cared about or wanted. All
| Microsoft was developing was the operating system they needed to
| perpetuate their Windows franchise. After long hold ups in
| development, this has left their Windows revenues at a trickle.
| The sad thing is the GNU/Linux camp has done little to combat
| this deficiency in innovation. They have been more concerned
| with creating an equivalent product at a better price rather than
| a better product at a better price. Sure GNU/Linux is a better
| product due to its inherent stability, performance and security,
| but these aren't the features that home consumers migrate
| platforms for. True innovation, such as improvements in usability,
| is the only way one can convince consumers to choose your product
| over a stagnant entrenched one like Windows. It is simple free
| market economics, the better product at the best price will win.
`----
http://free2code.blogspot.com/2007/04/innovation-real-killer-app.html
Change and development with open source
,----[ Quote ]
| Innovation goes hand in hand with open source software. Open source software
| builds on the innovative nature of people; it comes from people's desire to
| make something better. It also gives people the skills and resources to
| become innovative with software.
|
| This is not abstract speculation; a recent report from a group of corporate
| CIOs states, 'faster product cycles are seen as a big advantage for open
| source - CIOs believe that product innovation is faster in open source'.
`----
http://www.nccmembership.co.uk/pooled/articles/BF_WEBART/view.asp?Q=BF_WEBART_292509
Apple's Annual Developer's Conference Disappoints For Its Lack of Innovation
,----[ Quote ]
| Apple shares fell 3.45% yesterday on general investor disappointment
| with what was perceived as a lack of innovation at Apple's annual
| software developer's conference [WWDC].
`----
http://biz.yahoo.com/seekingalpha/070612/38015_id.html?.v=1
Balancing open source risk and the total innovation opportunity
,----[ Quote ]
| This week I have been banging on and on about the total
| innovation opportunity of using open source software as an
| enterprise development platform.
`----
http://www.businessreviewonline.com/os/archives/2007/01/balancing_open.html
Can you leave innovation to the customer?
,----[ Quote ]
| Open source innovation: how does it work?
|
| Ideas or problems are made freely available to anyone who can be bothered to
| look at them. They are then aired in online forums, meaning that glitches are
| ironed out in record time, and the forum creator charges to a manufacturer to
| develop the prototype and get the product onto the shelves.
`----
http://blogs.theage.com.au/innovator/archives/2007/09/can_you_leave_i.html
|
|
