Home Messages Index
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
Author IndexDate IndexThread Index

[News] SFLC/FSF Happy with the Outcome of the Latest GPL Legal Case

  • Subject: [News] SFLC/FSF Happy with the Outcome of the Latest GPL Legal Case
  • From: Roy Schestowitz <newsgroups@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Tue, 02 Oct 2007 14:15:28 +0100
  • Newsgroups: comp.os.linux.advocacy
  • Organization: Netscape / schestowitz.com
  • User-agent: KNode/0.10.4
SFLC: Setting Legal Precedent Not the Goal of GPL Case

,----[ Quote ]
| Software Freedom Law Center co-founder Dan Ravicher says the Center’s 
| copyright infringement case against Monsoon Multimedia on behalf of the  
| creators of BusyBox is not about setting legal precedent for the use and 
| interpretation of the GNU General Public License.   
`----

http://www.itbusinessedge.com/blogs/osb/?p=241


Related:

GPL defenders say: See you in court

,----[ Quote ]
| The license also requires anyone distributing GPL software, in an executable 
| form that a computer can run, to make the complete source code available. One 
| example: Cisco Systems subsidiary Linksys, which  shares the GPL software 
| used in its wireless networking equipment.   
`----

http://www.news.com/GPL-defenders-say-See-you-in-court/2100-7344_3-6210837.html


First U.S. GPL lawsuit heads for quick settlement

,----[ Quote ]
| The first U.S. GPL-related lawsuit appears to be headed for a quick 
| out-of-court settlement. Monsoon Multimedia admitted today that it had 
| violated the GPLv2 (GNU General Public License version 2), and said it will 
| release its modified BusyBox code in full compliance with the license.   
`----

http://www.linux-watch.com/news/NS3761924232.html


New Method To Detect and Prove GPL Violations

,----[ Quote ]
| "A paper to be presented at the upcoming academic conference Automated 
| Software Engineering describes a new method to detect code theft and could be 
| used to detect GPL violations in particular. While the co-called birthmarking  
| method is demonstrated for Java, it is general enough to work for other 
| languages as well..."   
`----

http://developers.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=07/08/25/1648253&from=rss


German Court convicted Skype of violating the GPL

,----[ Quote ]
| German district court Munich has convicted Skype of violating the GPL. One of 
| the VoIP telephones sold by Skype run Linux, but the GPL text was not handed 
| out together with the phone, although the GPL requires that.  
`----

http://liquidat.wordpress.com/2007/07/24/german-court-convicted-skype-of-violating-the-gpl/#comment-27057


German GPL defender claims legal victory
 
,----[ Quote ]
| Open-source programmer Harald Welte said Thursday he won a civil court
| case in Germany centered on the General Public License (GPL). The license
| governs many open-source projects and permits anyone to use software
| covered by it, but requires that companies incorporating GPL software
| make the underlying source code available.
`----

http://news.com.com/2061-10795_3-6113453.html?part=rss&tag=6113453&subj=news


gpl-violations.org project prevails in court case on GPL violation by D-Link

,----[ Quote ]
| D-Link Germany GmbH, a subsidiary of D-Link Corporation, Taiwan R.O.C.,
| distributed DSM-G600, a network attached storage (NAS) device which uses a
| Linux-based Operating System.  However, this distribution was incompliant 
| with the GNU General Public License (GPL) which covers the Linux Kernel and
| many other software programs used in the product.
`----

http://gpl-violations.org/news/20060922-dlink-judgement_frankfurt.html


Wallace's Appeal Firmly Rejected - GPL Has Nothing to Fear [pdf]

,----[ Quote ]
| PJ: "Just so you know, Daniel Wallace's appeal of the ruling
| against him in his pro se quest to overthrow the GPL on antitrust
| grounds, one of SCO's daydreams too, has been firmly rejected by
| the appeals court, as I knew it would be."
`----

http://www.groklaw.net/pdf/WallaceAppealRejected.pdf


Would Dostoevsky Use the GPL?

,----[ Quote ]
| I get nervous whenever large software shops talk up the virtues of a license 
| with fewer protections of developer and user rights. In the linked articles 
| above, there is talk of permissive licenses being the path of least 
| resistance, with the premise that it's "easier" to gravitate towards them. My 
| question is - easier for whom? Easier for the developers or easier for the 
| companies who wish to make use of it without those annoying obligations to 
| the greater free software ecosystem? As is often mentioned by others smarter 
| than me, a scenario where developers gravitate towards permissive licenses 
| makes it easier for companies to avoid community reciprocity.        
`----

http://tinosc.blogspot.com/2007/09/would-dostoevsky-use-gpl.html

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
Author IndexDate IndexThread Index