Home Messages Index
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
Author IndexDate IndexThread Index

[News] [Rival] Microsoft 'Innovated' and Renamed Java .SNOT

  • Subject: [News] [Rival] Microsoft 'Innovated' and Renamed Java .SNOT
  • From: Roy Schestowitz <newsgroups@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Wed, 31 Oct 2007 13:03:16 +0000
  • Newsgroups: comp.os.linux.advocacy
  • Organization: Netscape / schestowitz.com
  • User-agent: KNode/0.10.4
How ASP.NET began in Java

,----[ Quote ]
| So why did Microsoft deny it? I'm guessing, but maybe the company felt 
| that "Project Cool" was related to Java in people's minds, and wanted to 
| emphasise that .NET was 100 per cent Java-free. Any resemblance is purely 
| coincidental, as novelists like to say.   
`----

http://www.theregister.co.uk/2007/10/30/ukgov_cybercrime_response/


Related:

Did Microsoft just patent sudo?

,----[ Quote ]
| 1985, huh? And when did this Microsoft patent happen? It was filed in
| 2000. Well gee, that doesn't make sense. How'd they get the patent?
| It certainly falls under the category of "obvious" if there's prior
| art such as sudo.
| 
| What makes this whole thing funny, though, is something I saw a couple
| days ago. Head over to Builder-AU and listen to Peter Watson from
| Microsoft. He says,
| 
|   "User Account Control is a great idea and strategically
|   a direction that sort of all operating systems and all technology
|   should be heading down"
| 
| Excuse me? Does he really believe this is all Microsoft's great new
| idea?
| 
| In the end, this seems like a patent that Microsoft will hold up and
| say "we have a patent and Linux is violating it!" They won't ever
| sue on it though (just leave the threat hanging to scare away
| potential users), because then they could have the patent revoked.
| It's better for them to just wave it around.
`----

http://ubuntulinuxtipstricks.blogspot.com/2007/05/did-microsoft-just-patent-sudo.html


Microsoft Says Other OSes Should Imitate UAC

,----[ Quote ]
| The most controversial aspect of Watson's comments all center around
| the idea that Microsoft is a leader with UAC, and that other OSes
| should follow suit. UAC is a cousin of myriad "superuser" process
| elevation strategies, which Mac OS X and all flavors of Linux
| already enjoy. The fact is that Microsoft is late to the party
| with their Microsoftized version of sudo. That's really what UAC
| is, after all: sudo with a fancy display mechanism (to make it hard
| to spoof) and extra monitoring to pick up on "suspicious" behavior.
`----

http://arstechnica.com/news.ars/post/20070501-microsoft-uac-approach-is-so-good-other-oses-should-follow-suit.html
http://tinyurl.com/yw9ose


[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
Author IndexDate IndexThread Index