____/ Jim Richardson on Saturday 27 October 2007 00:47 : \____
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On Fri, 26 Oct 2007 23:27:20 +0100,
> Kier <vallon@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> On Fri, 26 Oct 2007 17:17:46 -0500, Scott Omumo wrote:
>>
>>> Kier wrote:
>>>> On Fri, 26 Oct 2007 17:29:34 +0000, p5000011 wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> On Fri, 26 Oct 2007 16:06:42 +0100, Mark Kent wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> William Poaster <wp@xxxxxxxxxx> espoused:
>>>>>>> Mark Kent wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> [H]omer <spam@xxxxxxx> espoused:
>>>>>>>>> Verily I say unto thee, that chrisv spake thusly:
>>>>>>>>>> Kier wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>> The people who work at MS are real people too, Mark. They have
>>>>>>>>>>> wives and children and mortgages too. None of them have horns
>>>>>>>>>>> and tails
>>>>>>>>>> None of them do?
>>>>>>>>> Kier the Microsoft apologist can't see them through his tinted
>>>>>>>>> glasses.
>>>>>>>> As I said, he's "hear no evil, see no evil, speak no evil". Or,
>>>>>>>> as they say up in Yorks, "you can't make a blind man see".
>>>>>>> It's quite staggering to me, that he just *cannot* see what's
>>>>>>> happening.
>>>>>> I've suspected for years that he's a proprietary software plant. He
>>>>>> spends most of his time encouraging the trolls. He's here to give
>>>>>> Linux a bad name.
>>>>> I don't agree. Kier is just very naive and gullible. The mental age
>>>>> I'd expect of a teenager. I believe he's a lot older and hence will
>>>>> not change. The bit bucket is the best place for him.
>>>>
>>>> You're an idiot.
I don't think that rebuts his argument too well.
>>> Actually he's Roy Culley, a special breed of idiot liar.
No chance.
>> And who exactly are *you*, dweeb?
Post seems genuine. Maybe a passer-by or a lurker.
> he's just another nymshifter. A nonentity.
I'm not sure about this. Watch the header.
--
~~ Best of wishes
Roy S. Schestowitz | GNU is Not Universal (begin recursion)
http://Schestowitz.com | GNU/Linux | PGP-Key: 0x74572E8E
Mem: 515500k total, 440980k used, 74520k free, 5400k buffers
http://iuron.com - next generation of search paradigms
|
|
