XML vs Open
,----[ Quote
| I heard Microsoft claiming that OOXML is open because it is in XML. In "open"
| they mean that anyone can use, process, manipulate, interpret OOXML
| documents. Is that really so? I say not!
|
| [...]
|
| The claim from Microsoft regarding OOXML being open because it is an XML
| format hits that very point I was making. This is just plain wrong and people
| need to understand why.
`----
http://lehors.blogspot.com/2007/10/xml-vs-open.html
Related:
,----[ Quote ]
| "[Microsoft:] For example, we should take the lead in establishing a common
| approach to UI and to interoperability (of which OLE is only a part). Our
| efforts to date are focussed too much on our own apps, and only incidentally
| on the rest of the industry. We want to own these standards, so we should
| not participate in standards groups. Rather, we should call 'to me' to the
| industry and set a standard that works now and is for everyone's
| benefit. We are large enough that this can work."
`----
http://www.os2site.com/sw/info/comes/px09509.zip
Six questions to national standardisation bodies
,----[ Quote ]
| Application independence?
|
| Supporting pre-existing Open Standards?
|
| Backward compatibility for all vendors?
|
| Proprietary extensions?
|
| Dual standards?
|
| Legally safe?
`----
http://fsfeurope.org/documents/msooxml-questions
OOXML: The Formula for Failure
,----[ Quote ]
| As I've shown, in the rush to write a 6,000 page standard in less than a
| year, Ecma dropped the ball. OOXML's spreadsheet formula is worse than
| missing. It has incorrect formulas that, if implemented according to the
| standard may cause loss of life, property and capital. This standard is
| seriously messed up. And shame on all those who praised and continue to
| praise the OOXML formula specification without actually reading it.
`----
http://www.robweir.com/blog/2007/07/formula-for-failure.html
Mathematically Incorrect
,----[ Quote ]
| So when it comes to comparing MSOOXML and ODF v1.0 on the basis of the
| inclusion of "Formula Definitions", it becomes clear that the anti-ODF folk
| have not much to shout about. In fact MSOOXML's "Formula Definition" is
| deficient and inaccurate.
`----
http://www.openmalaysiablog.com/2007/07/mathematically-.html
Guest Commentary: The converter hoax
,----[ Quote ]
| Microsoft maintains that while it would have been easy to support the Open
| Document Format (ODF) natively, it had to move to MS-OOXML because this was
| the only way for them to offer the full features of its office suite. But if
| Microsoft itself is not able to represent its internal data structures in the
| Open Document Format (ODF) in its Microsoft Office suite, how could an
| external conversion program from MS-OOXML accomplish this task? The answer to
| both questions is that it is not possible because two things cannot be the
| same and different at the same time.
`----
http://www.heise.de/open/artikel/92735
|
|
