Re: Consumers reject low quality OSS alternatives. Seem to be very happy

Home	Messages Index

[Date Prev]	[Date Next]	[Thread Prev]	[Thread Next]

Author Index	Date Index	Thread Index

Re: Consumers reject low quality OSS alternatives. Seem to be very happy with quality name brand products.

Subject: Re: Consumers reject low quality OSS alternatives. Seem to be very happy with quality name brand products.
From: Roy Schestowitz <newsgroups@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 23 Oct 2007 02:12:15 +0100
Newsgroups: comp.os.linux.advocacy
Organization: Netscape / schestowitz.com
References: <471cfea3$0$26365$88260bb3@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <1193085773.422317.8580@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <471d01b3$0$26454$88260bb3@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
User-agent: KNode/0.10.4

____/ Dan D. Lyons on Monday 22 October 2007 21:52 : \____

> I

*plonk*

Probably a forger anyway.

-- 
                ~~ Best of wishes

Roy S. Schestowitz      |    Windows XP: Dude, where's my RAM?
http://Schestowitz.com  |     GNU/Linux     |     PGP-Key: 0x74572E8E
Swap:  1510068k total,   148968k used,  1361100k free,    73864k cached
      http://iuron.com - next generation of search paradigms

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Consumers reject low quality OSS alternatives. Seem to be very happy with quality name brand products.
  - From: Linonut

References:
- Re: Consumers reject low quality OSS alternatives. Seem to be very happy with quality name brand products.
  - From: Dan D. Lyons

[Date Prev]	[Date Next]	[Thread Prev]	[Thread Next]

Author Index	Date Index	Thread Index