Erik Funkenbusch wrote:
> On Tue, 04 Sep 2007 20:47:38 +0200, Peter Köhlmann wrote:
>
>> Erik Funkenbusch wrote:
>>
>>> On Tue, 04 Sep 2007 17:43:58 +0100, Kier wrote:
>>>
>>>> On Tue, 04 Sep 2007 10:26:42 -0500, Erik Funkenbusch wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> On Tue, 04 Sep 2007 17:18:22 +0100, Kier wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>>> Always remember that Microsoft *loves* BSD, which is easy for it to
>>>>>>> abuse or misuse, just like Apple.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> If a licence says anyone can use the software, for any purpose, then
>>>>>> that's what anyone can do if they wish, and that includes MS and
>>>>>> Apple.
>>>>>
>>>>> I love the double standard so many GPL advocates have on this. They
>>>>> accuse
>>>>
>>>> How many?
>>>>
>>>>> Microsoft of "abusing" BSDL'd code, but when GPL coders use BSDL code
>>>>> and do not re-release their changes under BSDL, they talk about how
>>>>> "the license allows it, and they're doing nothing wrong".
>>>>
>>>> Who does?
>>>>
>>>> Some might. And they're wrong to do so if they attack MS for doing the
>>>> same thing. But who's to say they're a significant number in comparison
>>>> to the number of advocates overall?
>>>
>>> Just check out the thread on slashdot in response to Theo's complaints
>>> about GPL coders not giving code back to BSD.
>>
>> Theo should then perhaps read his precious BSD license
>
> See, you are proving my point.
No, I am not
But then, you are not smart enough to recognize that, MS shill and
astroturfer Erik Funkenbusch
--
I doubt, therefore I might be.
|
|
