____/ Mark Kent on Tuesday 04 September 2007 12:08 : \____
> [H]omer <spam@xxxxxxx> espoused:
>> Verily I say unto thee, that Roy Schestowitz spake thusly:
>>
>>> Windows Home Server ? Is It Really Worth It?
>> [...]
>>> How typical. Microsoft ignored everything but Microsoft.
>>
>> This product is far too limited to be useful, regardless of price or
>> compatibility.
>>
>> It's laughable that Microsoft should waste their time "reinventing" the
>> server like this, when the Free Software and Open Standards solution
>> already works an order of magnitude better, at virtually zero cost ...
>> *and* is fully cross-platform compatible.
>>
>> I have a tiny Mini-ITX server next door that already does everything
>> this sorry excuse for a so-called "server" does, and a whole /shedload/
>> more. The hardware cost me <100 squid off eBay, and the OS ... Fedora.
>>
>> Why did they even bother?
>>
>
> And Ashley Highfield believes that Microsoft will write a linux version
> of the Microsoft iPlayer?
>
No, now he just escapes the question by saying something like "I believe in
universality, but..."
--
~~ Best of wishes
An aristocrat's sexual escapades equate to Technocrat's hot RSS feed
http://Schestowitz.com | GNU is Not UNIX | PGP-Key: 0x74572E8E
http://iuron.com - proposing a non-profit search engine
|
|
