On Mon, 17 Sep 2007 19:11:40 +0200, Hadron wrote:
> John Locke <johnlocke98513@xxxxxxxxxxx> writes:
>
>> On Mon, 17 Sep 2007 09:29:37 +0200, Hadron <hadronquark@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>
>>>
>>>Office 2007 is not "Completely Unusable". And only someone as daft is
>>>Roy would propagate this bullshit. If he were to pick up an editor and
>>>improve a bit of OSS then maybe his time would be more constructively
>>>used.
>> I would agree with to a point. Office 2007 is not "Completely Unusable" BUT
>> it is "Completely Unnecessary". If Office 2003 is doing the job then why
>> do we need antoher Office version ?
>>
>
> Why do we have new kernels, Gnome & KDE features?
>
> Try and work it out.
The difference is, the GNOME and KDE releases aren't simply made to make
money.
--
Kier
|
|