Tim Smith <reply_in_group@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in
news:reply_in_group-B569D5.01530512092007@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx:
> In article <1218062.m9IdtGTYQt@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>,
> Roy Schestowitz <newsgroups@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> > There again goes Hadron Quarks claim of "easy to allocate a
>> > non-fragmented swap file". Which would be quite a bit larger than
>> > 256meg
>>
>> What else would you expect from Tim "filesystem expert", "weekly
>> stats analyst", "Funkenbush protege" Smith?
>
> It doesn't take a filesystem expert to figure out that you were wrong
> about Linux filesystems. It just takes using the "filefrag" command.
>
> Or it just takes paying attention. Peter has pointed out many times
> that fragmentation is a problem when you try to create large files.
> This is why, if you are going to use a swap file, you should create it
> soon after the filesystem is created, if you want it to be contiguous.
>
> If you are going to advocate Linux, maybe you should put a little
> effort into learning more about it?
Facts seem to scare Roy for some reason.
He runs from them like a chicken from a fox.
|
|
