Home Messages Index
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
Author IndexDate IndexThread Index

[News] Virtualisation Gets More Standardised, VMware (Linux-based) Brings ESX Server

  • Subject: [News] Virtualisation Gets More Standardised, VMware (Linux-based) Brings ESX Server
  • From: Roy Schestowitz <newsgroups@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Tue, 11 Sep 2007 14:18:01 +0100
  • Newsgroups: comp.os.linux.advocacy
  • Organization: Netscape / schestowitz.com
  • User-agent: KNode/0.10.4
Standard coming to virtualization format

,----[ Quote ]
| Major server companies Hewlett-Packard, Dell and IBM also are participating 
| in the effort, which is taking place within a group called the Distributed  
| Management Task Force that's standardized other server technologies as well. 
`----

http://news.zdnet.com/2100-9584_22-6206963.html

Standards maximise virtualisation

,----[ Quote ]
| When wanting to virtualise Linux, there are two predominant technologies: 
| VMware or Xen. Both camps are working on a common standard for 
| virtualisation. When these standards are fully realised, customers will be 
| able to switch between them with much greater ease than what is currently 
| possible.    
`----

http://www.itweb.co.za/sections/industryinsight/opensource/vanstaden070911.asp?S=Open%20Source&A=LIN&O=FPII

VMware unveils 32MB version of ESX Server

,----[ Quote ]
| The rumors about VMware putting ESX Server on dietary supplements have been 
| confirmed. The virtualization darling today revealed ESX Server 3i - a 
| super-thin hypervisor that will be built into the memory of servers from 
| companies such as Dell, HP and IBM.   
`----

http://www.theregister.co.uk/2007/09/10/vmware_esx_3i/


Related:

Microsoft aims at VMware's virtualization lead

,----[ Quote ]
| Windows accounts for about two-thirds of the market for computer-server 
| operating systems, by shipments, but Microsoft is considered a laggard in 
| virtualization to allow servers to run Linux or Unix operating systems 
| alongside its own software.   
`----

http://news.zdnet.com/2100-9584_22-6206641.html


Microsoft flip-flops on Vista virtualization

,----[ Quote ]
| Software like Parallels Desktop for the Mac or Microsoft's own Virtual 
| PC for Windows allow multiple operating systems to run simultaneously. 
| When it announced licensing rules for Vista last year, Microsoft said 
| that only Vista Business and Vista Ultimate could run as guest 
| operating systems. The company said virtualization presents inherent 
| security risks and that it hoped by limiting which versions of the OS 
| could act as virtual machines, only sophisticated users and businesses 
| would employ the tactic.
`----

http://news.zdnet.com/2100-3513_22-6191787.html


Microsoft Says No Windows Virtualization on Top of Linux

,----[ Quote ]
| Microsoft will not allow Windows Vista or Windows XP to be virtualized on top 
| of Linux, Sam Ramji, the director of Microsoft's open-source software lab, 
| said at the annual LinuxWorld Conference and Expo here Aug. 7.  
`----

http://www.eweek.com/article2/0,1759,2168183,00.asp?kc=EWRSS03119TX1K0000594


Ubuntu on [Microsoft's] Virtual PC 2007 - No way dude!

,----[ Quote ]
| A number of people have asked me whether it's possible to install
| Linux onto a Virtual PC 2007 virtual machine.  Well, since I had
| an Ubuntu ISO on my desktop I decided to give it a go.
| 
| The short answer is no.  It won't.  I thought that it might but
| my optimism was short-lived.  The graphics are all messed up.
`----

http://blogs.zdnet.com/hardware/?p=273


A Software Maker [VMWare] Goes Up Against Microsoft

,----[ Quote ]
| When quizzed on Microsoft's plans, Mr. Ballmer replied, "Our view is
| that virtualization is something that should be built into the
| operating system."
`----

http://www.nytimes.com/2007/02/24/technology/24soft.html?ex=1172898000&en=bbca645a927ef7f8&ei=5099&partner=TOPIXNEWS
http://tinyurl.com/35jkur


,----[ Quote ]
| The restrictions on virtualization were discussed here a couple of 
| months ago, but now the more people are waking up to the EULA restrictions.
| 
| MS claims it is "necessary for security reasons" and that only the "most 
| technically savvy users, or people in companies with tech support, 
| probably could handle Vista in virtualization programs, while home users 
| should be steered away."
`----

http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20070222/ap_on_hi_te/microsoft_virtual_vista_2


Is need for control behind Microsoft's flip-flop?

,----[ Quote ]
| Meanwhile, Gartner analyst Michael Silver took Microsoft to task 
| for its continued restrictions.
| 
| "Microsoft's policies...come off as a way to gouge customers," Silver 
| said in an e-mail, noting that customers are forced to pay for higher 
| priced editions, even though they don't get many of the benefits, like
|  the Aero user interface, which often won't work in a virtual machine.
| 
| Silver argues that Microsoft is likely leaving money on the table. 
| "Allowing use of lower priced (editions) could even be worth more 
| money to Microsoft as it would likely increase the number of people 
| that would legally run a Microsoft OS in a VM (like on a Mac)," 
| Silver wrote. "Eventually they will have no choice but to make their 
| peace with virtualization."
`----

http://news.com.com/8301-10784_3-9733433-7.html?part=rss&subj=news&tag=2547-1_3-0-20

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
Author IndexDate IndexThread Index