Home Messages Index
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
Author IndexDate IndexThread Index

[News] Signs of Rotten/Fraudulent Practices in OOXML Voting (Even After Recent Vote)

  • Subject: [News] Signs of Rotten/Fraudulent Practices in OOXML Voting (Even After Recent Vote)
  • From: Roy Schestowitz <newsgroups@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Tue, 11 Sep 2007 05:54:47 +0100
  • Newsgroups: comp.os.linux.advocacy
  • Organization: Netscape / schestowitz.com
  • User-agent: KNode/0.10.4
OOXML ballot comments 

,----[ Quote ]
| The DIS 29500 ballot comments have been published on the SC34 web site (ZIP 
| of Word documents). 
| 
| Glancing through them, I am struck by how much is word-for-word identical 
| between countries. Maybe countries shared comments (and certainly the open 
| Wiki for UK comments may have been a source), or maybe some of the larger 
| multi-national organisations reviewing DIS 29500 their fed pooled comments 
| down to many different nations. Ultimately, though, the source of comments 
| does not matter; what matters is whether they have technical merit.     
`----

http://www.adjb.net/index.php?entry=entry070909-104641

Word format? Doesn't that just give away the bias? More signs of fraud as well
(see the whole writeup.

http://www.jtc1sc34.org/

Here is how a panel on OOXML goes (Microsoft was 'caught' sending non-technical
people on purpose)

Working for Standards

,----[ Quote ]
| One is the "I don't understand" role. When the technical experts get going, 
| they decide on something, and then they need to figure out how to word it in 
| the specification. Making these experts come up with a good way of explaining 
| the issue and the resolution is incredibly important, but often doesn't 
| happen as the others on the committee are too embarrassed to admit that they 
| don't understand.     
| 
| In the end, technical committees need members who can talk to other people; 
| who listen to a different point of view and can respectfully disagree; who 
| can admit when someone has a better idea; and who can check their ego at the 
| door.   
`----

http://www.oreillynet.com/pub/a/womenintech/2007/09/07/working-for-standards.html


Related:

Corrupt countries were more likely to support the OOXML document format

,----[ Quote ]
| Is this just a random coincidence? The median of the CPI index of the above 
| mentioned 70 countries is 3.95. Of the most corrupted half (CPI index less 
| than 3.95) 23 or 77% voted for approval (approval or approval with comments) 
| and 7 or 23% for disapproval; 5 abstained. Of the least corrupted half (CPI 
| index more than 3.95) 13 or 54% voted for approval and 11 or 46% voted for 
| disapproval; 11 abstained - see the table below.      
`----

http://www.effi.org/blog/kai-2007-09-05.en.html


Microsoft accused of more OOXML standards fiddling 

,----[ Quote ]
| However the 11 new countries are refusing to say how they will vote. These 
| include Cote d'Ivoire, Cyprus, Ecuador, Jamaica, Lebanon, Malta, Pakistan, 
| Trinidad and Tobago, Turkey, Uruguay and Venezuela. Most people seem to think 
| that these have been put there by Vole to make sure the standard gets pushed 
| through.    
`----

http://www.theinquirer.net/default.aspx?article=42106

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
Author IndexDate IndexThread Index