On 10 Apr, 17:45, Erik Funkenbusch wrote:
> Your headline .. is saying that Microsoft replaces the MBR, but that's false. It doesn't, and the article explicitly says that.
Yea, they just broke the boot sequence instead. It is odd that only
now witrh SP1 that Microsoft discovered a security problem with the
MBR. What does the Microsoft Linux Lab think of the problem .. :)
Why do you keep repeating Roys subject headline ..
ref:
http://apcmag.com/vista_sp1_wont_install_on_dualboot_systems_microsoft.htm
|
|
