Home Messages Index
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
Author IndexDate IndexThread Index

[News] [SOT] Media Filled with Lies, UN Intervenes with British Libel Laws

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Russia/Georgia: War of the Web

,----[ Quote ]
| These sites would typically pick a dozen articles from the foreign media - 
| mostly American and British, but also that of the Baltic states and Eastern 
| Europe - and translate them into Russian. Needless to say, they usually do 
| their best to pick the most heinous articles, most of them full of bad 
| reporting and stereotypes about Russia. This may seem relatively innocent but 
| Inosmi has quickly gained a large following, which particularly delights in 
| commenting on articles, mostly to report on inaccuracies in the articles and 
| ignorance of their authors.       
| 
| Sites like Inosmi do their best perpetuate the myth of the "great 
| brainwashing" -- that the Western media is either utterly biased against 
| Russia or simply incompetent - and that the Western public and policy-makers 
| are being constantly kept in the dark as to the true nature of things in 
| Russia (this in itself is quite comical, as Russians themselves squandered  
| most of their independent media in the early Putin years; arguably, they are 
| in much greater darkness).     
`----

http://www.opendemocracy.net/russia/article/russia-georgia-war-of-the-web

British libel laws violate human rights, says UN

,----[ Quote ]
| The British libel laws have come under attack from the United Nations 
| committee on human rights for discouraging coverage of matters of major 
| public interest. The use of the Official Secrets Act to deter government 
| employees from raising important issues has also been criticised.   
| 
| The intervention by the UN comes in the wake of international disquiet over 
| the use of British courts for "libel tourism", whereby wealthy plaintiffs can 
| sue in the high court in London over articles that would not warrant an 
| action in their own country.   
`----

http://www.guardian.co.uk/uk/2008/aug/14/law.unitednations

They could take a look at the many smear campaigns Microsoft has been running
over the years.

“Analysts sell out - that’s their business model… But they are very concerned
that they never look like they are selling out, so that makes them very
prickly to work with.”

                                –Microsoft, internal document

http://antitrust.slated.org/www.iowaconsumercase.org/011607/3000/PX03096.pdf


Recent:

A Memo to Patrick Durusau

,----[ Quote ]
| I really must commend Patrick Durusau's innate capability of writing the most
| inflammatory and outrageous publications, publications that are so divorced
| from reality that one cannot help but think that the dude must be hoarding
| some seriously good weed to be able to live so completely within his own
| defined existence. His latest publication, "Not With a Bang, but With a
| Whimper", has been receiving flak from the collective open standards
| community for exactly that reason and rightly so.
|
| [...]
|
| Microsoft has been running an anti-ODF campaign in favour of OOXML for a long
| long time now. In Malaysia, their campaign started with opposition to
| Malaysia's proposed adoption of ODF ISO26300:2006 as a voluntary standard by
| invoking Fear, Uncertainty and Doubt on the ODF standard. The campaign
| continued on by personally attacking members of the technical committee who
| were in favour of ODF, by casting undue aspersions on their characters, in
| particular, insinuating that we were subversive agents of IBM intent on the
| destruction of Microsoft (apparently, anybody who supports truly open
| standards is a biased IBM agent).
`----

http://www.openmalaysiablog.com/2008/06/the-weed-whispe.html


Related:

A Microsoft Slur in the OOXML Saga -- Did I Tell You or Did I Tell You? -
Updated

,----[ Quote ]
| Remember I told you I've noticed that people who don't support Microsoft's
| agenda end up the victim of smear campaigns?
|
| The New Zealand Open Source Society is reporting that an employee at
| Microsoft New Zealand recently sent an email to one of the technical bodies
| advising an NB involved in the OOXML ISO process, smearing a man's
| reputation, Matthew Holloway, apparently to undermine his technical input
| which was critical of OOXML.    
`----

http://www.groklaw.net/article.php?story=20080318151252279


Tim Bray: Life Is Complicated

,----[ Quote ]
| Those with long memories might suggest a parallel between Rick’s position and
| mine when in 1997, I was sitting on the XML Working Group and co-editing the
| spec, on a pro bono basis as an indie consultant. Netscape hired me to
| represent their interests, and when I announced this, controversy ensued.
| Which is a nice way of saying that Microsoft went berserk; tried
| unsuccessfully to get me fired as co-editor, and then launched a vicious,
| deeply personal extended attack in which they tried to destroy my career and
| took lethal action against a small struggling company because my wife worked
| there. It was a sideshow of a sideshow of the great campaign to bury Netscape
| and I’m sure the executives have forgotten; but I haven’t.        
`----

http://www.tbray.org/ongoing/When/200x/2007/01/24/Mixup


How to Royally Annoy National Bodies

,----[ Quote ]
| Guide to future monopolists on how to alienate yourself from National Bodies:
|
|    1. Waste NBs time in reviewing monstrous draft specifications
|    2. Claim that these specs can do everything for anyone by standardising
|    marketing material
|    3. If you don't get your way at a certain level, lobby the superior above.
|    Dont stop! Go all the way to the head of the nation if you think you can!
|    4. Leak press stories to journalists to pressure Ministries to make a
|    decision. Quick!
|    5. Try to shut down TCs if actual technical work is done revealing issues
|    with your plan
|    6. Question Question Question everything (process, fairness, the system,
|    members) when things dont go your way
|    7. Otherwise create another TC with friendly experts
|    8. If the NB allows new members just by paying membership fees, encourage
|    your business partners to join with marketing funds. Stack-stack-stack it
|    high!  
|    9. Stalk decision makers, even if it means traveling around the globe with
|    them
|   10. Refuse changes in the spec especially if it breaks your product which
|   you released prior
|   11. Have private interviews with TC members in the guise of funding for
|   their new projects/research grants/interoperability initiatives and
|   conveniently talk about their position on your spec.  
|   12. Get your Business Partners to write in form letters. Some don't even
|   bother to change the templates
|   13. Attend TC meetings uninvited by fabricating business cards
|   14. Send Lawyers in to Technical Committee meetings who prefer not to
|   engage in "high-school" debates
|   15. Make rude and inaccurate statements against TC members in public
`----

http://www.openmalaysiablog.com/2008/03/how-to-royally.html


Q&A: Former Mass. CIO feels 'bittersweet pride' after battles with Microsoft,
legislature

,----[ Quote ]
| As CIO of Massachusetts from February to November last year, Louis
| Gutierrez had to endure most of the brunt of Microsoft Corp.'s political
| wrath over a state policy calling for the adoption of the Open Document
| Format for Office Applications, or ODF -- a rival to the software vendor's
| Office Open XML file format.
`----

http://www.computerworld.com/action/article.do?command=viewArticleBasic&articleId=9012760&source=rss_news50


,----[ Quote ]
| Quinn:  Almost to a person, to anybody involved or who knows about
| the ODF issue, they attributed the story to Microsoft, right, wrong
| or otherwise. Senator Pacheco may be a bully but I do not believe he
| is disingenious and would stoop to such a tactic. Senator Pacheco and
| Secretary Galvin's office remain very heavily influenced by the
| Microsoft money and its lobbyist machine, as witnessed by their
| playbook and words, in my opinion.
`----

http://www.groklaw.net/article.php?story=20060119232859729
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux)

iEYEARECAAYFAkikzNAACgkQU4xAY3RXLo7GcQCgs3vcwYfqjkIOrwrcK0TACtnZ
+OUAn1XnYwMmz2dXYd5AEQ9Ek6dWc3mU
=g0wJ
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
Author IndexDate IndexThread Index