-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Microsoft continues to woo open-source developers
,----[ Quote ]
| MANILA, Philippines -- Microsoft is set to launch a developer program aimed
| at local companies creating applications using the open-source model.
`----
http://technology.inquirer.net/infotech/infotech/view/20080812-154206/Microsoft-continues-to-woo-open-source-developers
"Please, stop competing with us, please. Here's some money. Join the
criminals."
Here's the fake barracks that's about software patents but gets
called "open-source":
Microsoft to open interoperability lab in Asia-Pacific
http://www.infoworld.com/article/08/08/12/Microsoft_to_open_interoperability_lab_in_AsiaPacific-Computerworld_Philippines_1.html
http://tinyurl.com/55l89m
Recent:
Bruce Perens: Microsoft and Apache - What's the Angle?
,----[ Quote ]
| But Microsoft can still influence how things go from here on. If they have to
| live with open source, the Apache project is Microsoft's preferred direction.
| Apache doesn't use the dreaded GPL and its enforced sharing of source-code.
| Instead, the Apache license is practically a no-strings gift, with a weak
| provision against patent lawsuits as its most relevant term. Microsoft can
| take Apache software and embrace and enhance, providing their own versions of
| the project's software with engineered incompatibility and no available
| source, just as they forced incompatibility into the Web by installing IE
| with every Windows upgrade.
|
| IE is derived from Mosaic, the original Web browser, open source with a
| license similar to Apache's. So, this isn't a new strategy. The plan, then,
| could be to have Microsoft servers vie for dominance with their own –
| Microsoft specialized – versions of Apache applications. Or it could be that
| Microsoft sees itself replacing Linux in the market as a hosting platform for
| open source....
|
| So, this $100,000 contribution and the partial patent grant aren't about
| interoperability. It's for publicity, and to convince government regulators,
| not the most technical people in the world, that Microsoft has joined open
| source and is now a well-behaved company, no anti-trust issues at all. The
| bad part for open source is that Microsoft is increasingly in a position to
| speak to European legislators as an insider in the open source community
| while requesting increases in software patenting that would block open
| source.
`----
http://itmanagement.earthweb.com/osrc/article.php/3762786/Bruce+Perens+Microsoft+and+Apache+-+Whats+the+Angle?.htm
Microsoft and Apache
,----[ Quote ]
| It all sounds good. But Apache is no threat to Microsoft, their projects run
| on Microsoft systems and their license doesn't prevent "embrace and enhance".
| Linux, GNU, OpenOffice, those are more of a threat. This is, obviously, a
| strategic move by Microsoft. I'm trying to convince myself that we
| didn't "get owned".
`----
http://technocrat.net/d/2008/7/25/46596
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux)
iEYEARECAAYFAkijao4ACgkQU4xAY3RXLo6lEQCfYjRutZb2BVnHRB1+lTV53uXM
wn4AoKGrhmnSwsDKayKnLsemAJOkFbKl
=z3M9
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
|
|
