On Wed, 24 Dec 2008 23:02:35 -0700, High Plains Thumper wrote:
> Hadron Quack the M$ shill wrote:
>> Sinister Midget writes:
>>
>>> In addition to all Windummie trolls being liars, they all lack any
>>> conscience or scruples. It's part of the screening process. They're
>>> shown films of His Billness talking about "knifing the baby" and Fester
>>> Blammer throwing chairs around and screaming about how he's going to
>>> "fucking kill Google". If a Windrone so much as shifts in his chair, no
>>> job, no trolling bonus and no papier mache stock options.
>>>
>>> How else to explain EZKill, DuFuS and Quirk?
>>
>> Explain what about me? I do not shill Windows and I challenge you to
>> prove I do.
He must have forgotten:-
<quote>
The great majority of Windows application SW
is eons better than it's OSS copy or alternative.
<unquote>
From: Hadron
Newsgroups: comp.os.linux.advocacy
Message-ID: <fkga6j$ure$1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
<quote>
I see no illegally maintained monopoly.
<unquote>
Hadron <hadronquark@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Newsgroups: comp.os.linux.advocacy
<quote>
Anyone who says Open Office is as
good as MS Office is living in denial.
<unquote>
From: Hadron Quark <hadronqu...@xxxxxxxxx>
Message-ID: <87wsxqrjmz.fsf@xxxxxxxxx>
Newsgroups: comp.os.linux.advocacy
And about his shilling:-:
<quote>
There is a certain amount of hostility towards Linux in most of your
posts. Your statement above is one prime example. Google can reveal plenty
others. Even a /blind/ person reading this newsgroup could pretty quickly
figure out that you do appear to favor MS...
<unquote>
From: Stephan Rose <nospam@xxxxxxxxxxx> Message-ID:
<DoCdnQ1r36i7Bx_anZ2dnUVZ8uCdnZ2d@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
<quote>
Well, unlike you, I'm not a confirmed liar, troll, MS-shill and waste of
bandwidth. What have you ever contributed to the world apart from your
cretinous babblings in various newsgroups (where you are mostly killfiled)?
<unquote>
From: Christopher Hunter in reply to Quack
Message-ID: <xczgj.154680$cJ3.19859@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
<quote>
Simply PLONK Hadron. Have the disposition be 'mark read'.
That way the article will not be downloaded, and the only thing
that will show up is the existance of the shill. :-)
<unquote>
CBFalconer - alt.os.linux.ubuntu
Sunday 30 Dec 2007
> http://groups.google.com/group/comp.os.linux.advocacy/msg/2b842599bbefc883
>
> [quote] The more they dig, the less there is linking netbook takeup to it
> being Linux. I wonder why they bother?
>
> Netbooks WITH Linux are excellent. And I intend to replace my thinkpad
> with one WHEN I find one built to the same rigorous standards. But people
> *generally* don't want them. They want XP. Linux simply missed the boat.
> And *until* there is the same suite of SW for syncing Mobile phone and PDA
> to them , well, Linux can forget it. [/quote]
>
>> I do, however, advocate GOOD OSS
>
> http://groups.google.com/group/comp.os.linux.misc/msg/977239e3b0d56f6c
>
> [quote] I was referring to the MS Windows programming methodologies
> comment. The "less disciplined" bit is crap too. Most projects are so damn
> disciplined these days they have certificates coming out of their cracks
> but very little SW. OSS is a different kettle of fish - almost zero
> discipline and "yet another copycat program" every other day. [/quote]
>
>> and the Debian Operating System.
>
> http://groups.google.com/group/comp.os.linux.advocacy/msg/3364e9f972538fd9
>
> [quote] Once more for the hard of brain power : I use testing. Not
> unstable. And I use it for a reason - Debian Stable is simply too buggy
> and backward and I cant be arsed to manage pinning or selectively
> monitoring backports. [/quote]
>
>> My raison d'etre here is simply to counter the lies and bullshit you and
>> your ilk spew on a daily basis.
> http://groups.google.com/group/comp.os.linux.advocacy/msg/9a828ec7850814a6
>
> [quote]
> Hadron wrote:
>> SomeBloke <st...@xxxxxxxxx> writes: [...]
>>
>> All very wordy, but ultimately you say nothing. As I pointed out in
>> another reply your own self regard is sadly let down by the emptiness of
>> your statements. The article *is* relevant you retard because it
>> answered your rather ridiculous question about the body. Seriously,
>> you're not HPT under another nym are you? Do ask if you need anything
>> else answering or explaining.
>
> It's not the first time you have stupidly mistaken me for High Plains
> Thumper. Is it because you are of limited intelligence or are YOU a
> 'retard'?
> [/quote]
--
No room for the horrors
of Micro$oft here!
-- Stephen Fry - Room 101 --
|
|
