-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
____/ Michael B. Trausch on Wednesday 03 December 2008 16:22 : \____
>
>
> On Wed, 03 Dec 2008 09:30:36 +0000
> Roy Schestowitz <newsgroups@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>> People just don't seem to understand..
>>
>>
http://omarsdaydreams.blogspot.com/2008/11/people-just-dont-seem-to-understand.html
>
> Roy,
>
> How does posting someone else's rant (who doesn't present anything but
> conclusions, without showing the information that led them there) help
> anything? Why do you advocate the use of FUD when it is convenient for
> you? Would it be too much to ask that you constrain yourself to
> advocating for Linux systems, if you can't have any decent respect for
> free software in general? Also, what's your opinion on the GNU
> implementation of the CLR and C# languages?
>
> Just curious. It seems that your (and everyone else's) standard
> argument against Mono is based nearly solely on argumentum ad hominem,
> and it seems that everyone's forgotten where Mono really started.[1]
>
> --- Mike
>
> [1] http://www.ondotnet.com/pub/a/dotnet/2001/07/09/icaza.html
There are many reasons why Mono is a risk. I aummarised some reasons in <
http://boycottnovell.com/2008/03/24/mono-danger-to-linux/ >.
- --
~~ Best of wishes
"The number of developers working on improving Linux vastly exceeds the number
of Microsoft developers working on Windows NT."
--Paul Maritz, Microsoft
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux)
iEYEARECAAYFAkk3J7gACgkQU4xAY3RXLo4cgwCeJ0Zvfzz5qvXk3HS9d3AK0zqk
scUAoLJsnJr8ayNXuIZKZHCatLbYa7kB
=XcCT
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
|
|
