William Poaster <wp@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:
> Richard Rasker wrote:
>
>> Troy Kirkland wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> "Hadron" <hadronquark@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
>>> news:fq7c0b$p73$3@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>>>
>>>> ,----
>>>> |
>>>> | Debate on OOXML standard continues behind closed doors
>>>> |
>>>> | With 6,000 pages of text subject to 1,100 modifications, all to be
>>>> approved by 120 delegates from 37 countries in just
>>>> | five days, the task facing the standards committee discussing
>>>> Microsoft's Office Open XML (OOXML) document format in
>>>> | Geneva this week is mammoth.
>>>> |
>>>> |
>>>>
>>
> http://www.linuxworld.com/news/2008/022708-debate-on-ooxml-standard-continues.html?fsrc=rss-linux-news
>>>> `----
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Perhaps they're only interested in the opinions of people who are educated
>>> in the subject matter. Paid spammers need not apply.
>>
>> "Paid spammers", as in "entities paid by a third party to push this third
>> party's product by overwhealming presence and persistence"? Like all those
>> new ISO "members", gaining membership and pushing OOXML only because
>> Microsoft promised them goodies?
>>
>>
>> Richard Rasker
>
> Well, bloody well. Once again you see Quack the M$ Shill siding with a troll,
> how unusual.
Willy, please note I posted the first article about OOXML meetings
behind closed doors.
So you got it wrong. Again.
|
|
