-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On Thu, 21 Feb 2008 13:14:02 -0600,
Tom Shelton <tom_shelton@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On 2008-02-21, Linonut <linonut@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> * Tom Shelton peremptorily fired off this memo:
>>
>>> On 2008-02-21, Roy Schestowitz <newsgroups@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>> ____/ Tom Shelton on Thursday 21 February 2008 08:19 : \____
>>>>
>>>>> "mono contamination" - because it really is attracting some interest
>>>>> in the .NET community.
>>>>
>>>> In the Linux community also -- and not in a good way.
>>>>
>>>> http://newsforge.com/feed/127462
>>>>
>>>> This was viewed about 6000 times for a reason. Without /. effect or
>>>> anything... in fact, Paul and Mark of Fedora and Ubuntu were
>>>> informed of this problem as well.
>>>
>>> I respect your oppinion on this issue, but I believe you are
>>> misguided . Do you really want to loose the interest of some 6
>>> million odd developers (last i saw a figure, could be more or less
>>> now)?
>>
>> Are you saying that 6 million developers will try to leverage .NET on
>> Linux?
>>
>
> No - I really doubt that will happen, but that is the potential market
> that could be won over :)
>
You think that there are 6million .net developers?
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFHvexcd90bcYOAWPYRAke6AKDr/0Hn/rabVlHRaUytRaUfgMybVwCeKYc3
oh3rV1+6qWfXYkKadtcmfhk=
=Wfqu
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--
Jim Richardson http://www.eskimo.com/~warlock
I never believe anything until it's been officially denied.
|
|
