On 2008-01-09, Roy Schestowitz <newsgroups@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> claimed:
> ____/ Bob Tennent on Wednesday 09 January 2008 13:17 : \____
>> How about Tainted Linux?
>
> I tried this before, but people take offence in that. When words
> like 'infected' or 'tainted' are used, I've faced comparisons to Nazi
> propaganda from a pro-Novell zealot (others attacked him for suggesting this).
Who cares what a pro-Noveller thinks of the label? How many real
backers (versus additional socks) does he really have? Billy, Blammer,
a few freaks like DuFus and analus headupus, maybe a Timmy or two, and
certainly an Ewik.
If Novell and s/h/it's monions wanted to remain on good terms with
linux users, they should've steered clear of selling their whorish
bodies to M$.
--
I can see clearly now, Windows is gone.
|
|
