Home Messages Index
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
Author IndexDate IndexThread Index

[News] GovTech: Monopolies are Inherently Anticompetitive

  • Subject: [News] GovTech: Monopolies are Inherently Anticompetitive
  • From: Roy Schestowitz <newsgroups@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Mon, 07 Jan 2008 13:08:33 +0000
  • Newsgroups: comp.os.linux.advocacy
  • Organization: Netscape / schestowitz.com
  • User-agent: KNode/0.10.4
The Fire Next Time

,----[ Quote ]
| There are no true altruists in the standards game.
| 
| Every urge government has is to extract the setting of standards from the 
| market and establish them for the common good, as monopolies are inherently  
| anticompetitive. The problem is that in fast-changing, evolving spaces - like 
| IT - bureaucratic or communal attempts at setting standards are hopelessly 
| slow.    
`----

http://www.govtech.com/gt/224391?topic=117688

"It just tells you how desperate Microsoft is for a competitor that they’re
holding up a software box produced by 100 guys in the hills of North Carolina.
Who are they trying to kid?"

                --Robert Young, CEO of Red Hat

About Microsoft, being anticompetitive is one thing, but being outright corrupt
is another.


Related:

Corrupt countries were more likely to support the OOXML document format

,----[ Quote ]
| Is this just a random coincidence? The median of the CPI index of the above 
| mentioned 70 countries is 3.95. Of the most corrupted half (CPI index less 
| than 3.95) 23 or 77% voted for approval (approval or approval with comments) 
| and 7 or 23% for disapproval; 5 abstained. Of the least corrupted half (CPI 
| index more than 3.95) 13 or 54% voted for approval and 11 or 46% voted for 
| disapproval; 11 abstained - see the table below.      
`----

http://www.effi.org/blog/kai-2007-09-05.en.html


Microsoft accused of more OOXML standards fiddling 

,----[ Quote ]
| However the 11 new countries are refusing to say how they will vote. These 
| include Cote d'Ivoire, Cyprus, Ecuador, Jamaica, Lebanon, Malta, Pakistan, 
| Trinidad and Tobago, Turkey, Uruguay and Venezuela. Most people seem to think 
| that these have been put there by Vole to make sure the standard gets pushed 
| through.    
`----

http://www.theinquirer.net/default.aspx?article=42106


Legacy format FUD

,----[ Quote ]
| From CyberTech Rambler (and Slashdot) comes the news that the Office 2003 
| Service Pack #3 disables (blocks) access to a number of legacy document 
| formats. Details are in this MS support article. Formats so blocked include 
| legacy Lotus 1-2-3 and Corel Quattro Pro formats. Why? According to the 
| Microsoft support article, "By default, these file formats are blocked 
| because they are less secure. They may pose a risk to you.".     
| 
| [...]
| 
| Now it may be entirely possible that these old import filters in Excel are 
| poorly written and poorly maintained and that Microsoft may be trying to 
| reduce the overall security exposure of MS Office by ditching old code that 
| is not strategic for them. But call it that. The MS Office code has the 
| problem. Don't malign the formats. Don't make up some untenable story that 
| DIF format is "less secure" and "may pose a risk for you".     
`----

http://www.robweir.com/blog/2008/01/legacy-format-fud.html

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
Author IndexDate IndexThread Index