Antonio Murphie wrote:
>
> "Linonut" <linonut@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
> news:sRsej.42969$vt2.1997@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>* Antonio Murphie fired off this tart reply:
>>
>>> "Roy Schestowitz" <newsgroups@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
>>> news:35279476.aPtAkqZxjB@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>>
>>> In other words.... it's just like "Remote Desktop" which has been
>>> bundled
>>> with every Windows computer for the past 8 years.
>>
>> Nope. First, X has been around in one form or another for 23 years.
>> SSH has been around for 12 years.
>
> Thanks for the history lesson but what does it matter? The issue isn't
> which protocol has been around the longest... it's functionality.
In the functionality department, "Remote Desktop" does not even come close
to the linux offerings. It is a poor excuse for MS inability to come up
with something functional
Linux /can/ administer a remote windows computer via remote desktop, BTW
It is just another remote protocol for linux machines
> In the
> end the user has a graphical connection to the remote computer. Whether
> ssh has been around 12 years and RDP only 8 years isn't relevant. The
> issue is administering a remote computer.
Stop moving the goalposts.
You have been shown to be clueless, yet you talk about things you know
absolutely nothing of
< snip >
--
Microsoft is not the answer. Microsoft is the question. The answer is NO
|
|
