____/ Mark Kent on Friday 18 January 2008 23:06 : \____
> [H]omer <spam@xxxxxxx> espoused:
>> Verily I say unto thee, that nessuno@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx spake thusly:
>>
>>>
http://arstechnica.com/news.ars/post/20080117-exonerated-riaa-defendant-scores-double-victory-in-court.html
>>
>> "The RIAA has denied any wrongdoing"
>>
>> Of course, after all - stalking and intimidating a 10 year old girl by
>> "impersonating the girl's grandmother"[1], whilst conducting "illegal,
>> flawed and negligent investigations"[2], is perfectly /acceptable/ ...
>> if you're the RIAA.
>>
>> [1] http://www.theregister.co.uk/2007/06/27/woman_sues_riaa/
>> [2] http://www.groklaw.net/articlebasic.php?story=20070625162738896
>>
>> The RIAA are a bunch of thugs, and it is they who should be in prison.
>>
>
> Considering the outcomes of the Enron and Worldcom cases, the
> possibility of RIAA enforcers and their godfathers, sorry, bosses, being
> jailed, seems to be not so unlikely.
http://geekz.co.uk/lovesraymond/archive/gpl-killed-the-mpaa-star
There's a more recent one which is much funnier, but I couldn't find it. It was
hilarious, so it's a shame...
--
~~ Best of wishes
Roy S. Schestowitz | "All your archives are (sic) belong to Google"
http://Schestowitz.com | RHAT Linux | PGP-Key: 0x74572E8E
03:05:02 up 12:45, 3 users, load average: 1.10, 1.14, 1.36
http://iuron.com - Open Source knowledge engine project
|
|
