On Fri, 18 Jan 2008 13:49:36 +0100, Hadron wrote:
> Kier <vallon@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:
>
>> On Fri, 18 Jan 2008 09:32:05 +0000, Mark Kent wrote:
>>
>>> Roy Schestowitz <newsgroups@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> espoused:
>>>
>>>> Whether you should bury the hatchet (kf) or not is up to you. If you
>>>> don't
>
> Burying the hatchet would be shaking hands and trolling together in harmony
>
>>>> like troll-feeding, then you can set the kf to suit your reading preferences,
>>>> but what doesn't suit your scope doesn't make the divide between "troll"
>>>> and "not troll" for everyone else.
>>>
>>> The term Troll has a very specific definition - essentially, it means
>>> someone who works to cause responses from others, mainly by writing
>>> or claiming unlikely or unbelievable things repeatedly, over and over,
>>> for the simple purpose of getting responses and keeping threads going.
>>> Trolling can range from merely responding with abuse (as he does above)
>>> to making silly claims (like "you *have* to have evidence" whilst ignoring
>>> the presented evidence).
>>>
>>>> The word troll is very offensive because
>>>> it's usually ascribed to the Earth's scum (people like Gary Stewart, Scott
>>>> Douglas, Ray Lopez, Bill Weisgerber and others).
>
> LOL
I wonder what Roy Schestowitz's definition of the term SPAMMER is?
|
|
