Kier <vallon@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:
> On Fri, 18 Jan 2008 09:32:05 +0000, Mark Kent wrote:
>>
>> There is no value to this remark, it adds nothing to the debate at all,
>> however, it is most definitely designed to provoke an emotional response,
>> as the Wiki entry defines (in part) trolling.
>
> I'll tell you what it adds - my strong dislike of being accused of having
> an 'agenda', which I do not, of trolling, which I do not, and of being
> asked silly questions like do I work for the BBC, when it is plainly
> obvious *I do not*.
Kier, do not feed the troll. It's clear that Mark Kent can not be for
real. A very good pisstake though.
>
>>
>> Hence my viewpoint, and my use of the word troll, against the generally
>> accepted meaning. There are, naturally, a huge number of very offensive
>> troll types which are well defined, but I don't know how many of them,
>> if any, would apply to Kier's interesting, very consistent, and unusual
>> (at least for cola) behaviour.
>
> Unusual in what way? I am an advocate. That doesn't mean I have to swallow
> all the nonsense that sometimes gets posted here just because it is
> anti-MS.
The Mark Kent troll is fishing. Ignore him.
|
|
